3919

כּוֺכָב

1

 

 

כּוֺכָב> (kk~b) nom. star (# 3919)       

 

 

 

 

ANE    Cognates to kk~b meaning star are common in the Sem. languages:  e.g., Ugar. kbkb or kkb, Akk. kakkabu, Aram. kkb~', Syr. kaukb~, Arab. kaukab.  Etymolo­gies have been proposed from kbb, burn (Akk., Aram. and Arab.) and from kabba, roll, revolve (Arab.).  Unlike modern Eng. usage but parallel to ancient G, the Sem. word probably includes planets, comets, meteors, or any bright object in the night sky.

 

Three features of stars were especially important in the ANE and relevant to OT background:  (1) the worship of stars as gods; (2) divination by stars, or astrology; and (3) stars as timekeepers.

 

1. The worship of astronomical objects as gods is quite old and widespread.  Babylonian worship of the sun god Šamaš, the moon god Sin, Ištar as the planet Venus, and Marduk as the planet Jupiter was influential throughout the ANE.  This system was later borrowed by the Greeks (and from them by the Romans), so that our modern planet names are those of Roman deities.

 

2. The belief that the heavenly bodies are divine would encourage the thought that stellar phenomena might be messages for earth, particularly in a society already disposed to divination.  The Sum. Gudea cylinders (c2100 BC) mention a goddess appearing in a dream with a map of the heavens and telling the king that the time is right to build a temple.  Old Babylonian texts (c1800 BC) list omens to be inferred from lunar eclipses and other heavenly phenomena.  These were later compiled (by 1000 BC) into the 70-tablet reference work Enma Anu Enlil, influential through­out the ANE to Hellenistic times, connecting specific phenomena of sun, moon, planets, stars and weather with events on earth.  Unlike Hellenistic (and modern) horoscopic astrology, such predictions involved public events, kings, and nations rather than private individu­als.

 

3. The worship of stars and the belief they predict earthly events may have arisen from the fact that the stars certainly predict the seasons and sunrise, function­ing as calendars and clocks.  As the earth makes its yearly orbit around the sun, the stars move westward, rising four minutes earlier each night, thus providing a conve­nient set of markers for the seasons.  Already by 3000 BC, the Egyptians had noticed that each year the star Sothis (Sirius) rose just before sunrise at the time of the annual Nile flooding.  By the Middle Kingdom (c2100-1800 BC) the Egyptians had devel­oped a list of 36 "decans" (single stars or constellations) spanning the whole year, with each successively rising with the sun at 10-day intervals.  In Mesopotamia a similar system was devel­oped during the Old Babylonian period (c1800-1500 BC).  The positions of such stars could also be used to tell time at night (when sundials are useless) as tables had been constructed to calibrate the hours of the night with the current day and month.

 

Babylonian stars and constel­la­tions have been identified using the astronomical text mulAPIN (c700 BC; Van der Waerden, 1949, 13-16).  Sufficient detail is given that nearly all the major Babylonian constella­tions have been identified with reasonable certainty.  Many of these are the same as the ancient G constella­tions we use today:  e.g., our Gemini was also for the Babylonians a pair of twins; Leo was a lion (possibly a dog); Corvus, a raven; Libra, a pair of scales; Taurus, a bull; Scorpio, a scorpion; Capricorn, a goat-fish; and Orion, the "true shepherd of the sky."  On the other hand, others are different:  Ursa Major was a wagon (but cp. Eng. Charles' Wain); Cygnus and part of Cepheus, a panther; Pisces and parts of Pegasus and Androme­da, a large swallow; Canis Major, a bow and arrow; Lyra, a goat; Hercules, a dog; and Aries, a hired laborer. These differences undermine the attractive theory that a "gospel in the stars" comes down to us from patriarchal times, as proposed by F. Rolleston and popular­ized by J. A. Seiss and E. W. Bullinger.

 

OT       1. kk~b is used 37x with two areas of meaning: (1) commonly as our word "star" (e.g., Gen 1:16; Exod 32:13) and (2) rarely (1-3x) as an alternative term for "angel" (Job 38:7; Isa 14:12-13?).  Both stars and angels are called the "hosts of heaven" (e.g., Deut 4:19 vs. 1 Kgs 22:19).  Some see this as an indication that the stars were thought to be angels, though the connection may be no more than that angels, too, are bright objects in the sky.  Others, with later rabbin­ic theol­ogy, ex­plain this usage by seeing angels in charge of each star, just as angels are over various nations (Dan 10:20).

 

2. The stars are created by God (Gen 1:16; Ps 8:3) and under his providential control (Isa 40:26; Jer 31:35).  They were "to separate the day from the night" and "serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years" (Gen 1:14).  The sun, of course, marks off the days, the moon indicates the months, and the stars (by their positions relative to the sun) the seasons and the years.  They were also created to praise God (Ps 148:3-6), perhaps by their brightness (Dan 12:3; Ps 136:9), purity (Job 25:5), height (Job 22:12) and number (e.g., Gen 15:5).  They form a significant element in what the psalmist meant by saying, "The heavens declare the glory of God, the skies proclaim the work of his hands" (Ps 19:1).  Thus stars are a part of God's self-revelation in nature, his handiwork pointing beyond them­selves to God's bright­ness, purity, greatness and power.  The stars being merely created, God's people are not to worship them (Deut 4:19) as the pagans do.  They are not gods, nor are they eternal, but rather (with the heavens) they are wearing out like clothing and will one day be discarded (Ps 102:25-26).

 

The number of stars is uncountably vast (e.g., Gen 15:5), yet apparently finite (Ps 147:4).  They are often used (occasionally with the sand of the sea­shore) to illus­trate the promise to Abraham of a multitude of descen­dants (Gen 15:5; 22:17; 26;4; Exod 32:13; Deut 1:10; 10:22; 28:62).  Provisional fulfillment of this promise had already occurred when Israel entered Canaan (Deut 1:10; 10:22) but might be lost again by disobedience if Israel brought itself under the covenant curses (Deut 28:62).  In his military census, David feared to count all of Israel (1 Chr 27:23), perhaps thinking such a count would be tempting God who had promised an uncountable multi­tude.

 

3. In prophetic contexts, stars are used symbolically to represent prominent individuals C Joseph's brothers in one of his dreams (Gen 37:9-10), the coming ruler in Balaam's vision (Num 24:17), the king of Babylon in Isaiah's taunt (Isa 14:12-13).  In the last of these, the symbol seems to represent the king's exaltation, and his subse­quent abasement is pictured by being cast down to the earth.  In Daniel's eschato­logical promise to the wise (Dan 12:3), they are to "shine like the brightness of the heavens . . . like the stars for ever and ever."

 

The darkening of the stars, sun, and moon is a motif in curse contexts, including Job's lament regarding the day of his birth (Job 3:9), his character­ization of God's power in judgment (Job 9:7), Qoheleth's picture of old age (Eccl 12:2), Isaiah's oracle against Babylon (Isa 13:10), the locust plague of Joel (2:10), and the eschato­logical darkness which it foreshadows (Joel 3:15).

 

4. The meaning of terms apparently used for particular stars, planets, and star-groups are rather uncertain due to the infrequency of their occurrence in the OT, the lack of specifying detail in such contexts, the rarity of identifiable cognate expres­sions in the Sem. languages, and the diversity of renderings in the ancient versions.

 

(a) kyyn (#3962) occurs only 1x (Amos 5:26), in a context of idolatry.  The NIV renders the word "pedestal," from the root kwn, be firm.  More commonly this is assumed to be a proper name kw~n for the planet Saturn viewed as a god.  The Akk. cognate is kaiwnu, Syr. kw~n, Arab. kaiw~n.  It is assumed that the peculiar vowels in the Heb. kyn were substituted from šiqquş, abomination (#9199), one means by which biblical scribes expressed contempt for paganism. 

 

(b) km (#3966) occurs 3x (Amos 5:8; Job 9:9; 38:31), all in astronomi­cal contexts.  The LXX guesses or paraphrases the first, gives Arcturus in the second, and Pleiades in the third.  The Vulg. gives Arcturus in the first two, but Pleiades in the last.  BDB and KBL3 favor the bright, closely grouped star cluster Pleiades on the basis of Sem. cognates in Akk., Arab., Eth. and Syr. meaning heap, herd or family.  Other interpret­ers suggest one of the bright stars Arcturus, Sirius, or Aldebaran.

 

(c) kesl II (#4068) occurs 4x, 3x in the sing. with km, above, and 1x in the pl. (Isa 13:10).  The LXX paraphrases the first, gives Hesperus (evening star) for the second, and Orion for the third and fourth.  The Vulg. has Orion for the first and second, Arcturus for the third, and splendor for the fourth.  The word kesl I is a common nom., occurring 70x (mostly in Prov) with the meaning fool, shameless one.  The Targum Jonathan renders the Job passages nifila, giant, which is consistent with Greek myths about Orion the giant hunter.  Driver (1956, 2) connects these ideas with the Pesh. rendering gabb~r and the cognate Arab. jabbru, sees in kesl a nuance thick, stout, clumsy, and so identifies the constellation as Orion.  The pl. occur­rence is puzzling:  "The stars of the heaven and their constella­tions will not show their light."  It is not easy in such a context to see a reference to the stars that make up Orion or to some few constella­tions associated with Orion, given the first possessive "their."  But if we think of the word as meaning giants, then all the constellations are giant collections of stars, and many are gigantic pictures of people.  So the NIV rendering is perhaps the best guess after all.

 

(d) mazz~l (#4655) occurs only 1x (2 Kgs 23:5) and that as the pl. mazz~lt, unless the word mazz~rt (1x, Job 38:32) is just a variant spelling of the same.  The l/r variation does occur in Sem. languages, and the LXX transliterates both occurrences as mazourth.  BDB (561) suggest the word may be loaned from Assyr. manzaltu, mazaltu, station, abode (of the gods).  Later Heb. and Aram. have cognate words meaning star of fortune, fate.  Syr. has two cognates meaning zodiac and stations of the moon.  All in all, either zodiacal constellations or planets (which appear only in the zodiac) would fit the data.  Driver (1956, 4-8), in fact, opts for a distinction between the two words, suggesting mazz~lt means planets, and mazz~rt, zodiacal circle.

 

(e) ma`adannt (#5051) occurs 2x, once in an astronomical context (Job 38:31) and once not (1 Sam 15:32).  Both passages are somewhat uncertain.  Did Agag come to Samuel haltingly (NRSV, NEB), confidently (NIV), cheerfully (RSV, NASB), delicately (KJV), trembling (TEV), or struggling (NAB)?  BDB and KBL3 suggest a root `nd which involves a transposition of letters, but means bind. Thus Agag came to Samuel bound, and Job 38:31 asks "Can you bind the chains of the Pleiades, Or loose the cords of Orion?" (NASB), in agreement with the parallelism in Job and with its rendering by the LXX and the Targum.

 

(f) mišţ~r (#5428) occurs just once, in Job 38:33: "Do you know the laws of the heavens?  Can you set up [God's] dominion (mišţ~r) over the earth?"  The verbal root šţr occurs in Assyr. and Arab. meaning to write.  Aram. and Syr. have cognate nom. meaning document, and Akkad. another meaning inscription.  The nom. šţr in Heb. means official, officer.  KBL3 suggests Himmelschrift = Sternenhimmel (heavenly writing = starry sky), though the idea of an written decree, heaven's or God's, seems better to fit both the lexical background and the parallelism in the context.

 

(g) mšekt (#5436) occurs just once, in Job 38:31.  The root mšk has the force draw, drag, lead, proceed, prolong, from which the idea arises that the nom. might mean cords, by which such an action is accomplished.  BDB (604) see an allusion to an unknown legend in which Orion is dragged by cords.  Driver (1956, 3-4) proposes the word should be pointed as singular (as implied by LXX, Vulg., Pesh.) and read as Orion's belt.

 

(h) nidg~lt (#5609) occurs 2x, in Cant 6:4, 10, the former a geographical context, the latter astronomical.  The NIV renders the former "majestic as troops with banners," the latter "majestic as the stars in procession."  The form is apparently a ni. part. used as a subst., from dgl II, carry or set up a standard #1839), so "ones bannered" or "bannered hosts."  The NIV rendering takes this in the first context as referring to a human army and in the second to the (astronomical) heavenly host.  Others derive the part. from dgl I, look, behold, to get things seen, or "awe-inspiring as visions" (Murphy, Hermene­ia) or "splendid as the heavenly phenomena" (Snaith, NCB).

 

(i) `~š III (#6933) occurs 2x (if `ayiš is the same word), both astronomical contexts (Job 9:9, 38:32).  There is consid­erable disagreement on its identification.  In 9:9 the Vulg.  gives Arcturus, brightest star in the constellation Bootes; possibly the LXX agrees, if it did not translate the three star groups in the order of the MT.  But in 38:32, they give Hesperus/Vesper (Venus as the evening star).  Ibn Ezra claimed it was the Bear (Ursa Major), in which case its children (38:32) would probably be the 3 stars in the handle of the Big Dipper.  Hlscher and KBL3 give Leo, taking the Arab. `ayt, lion, to be cognate.  Schiaparelli and Driver prefer Aldebaran, the brightest star in Taurus, with the sur­rounding Hyades cluster as its children.  The Syr. cognate `iyta' given in the Pesh. is so identified by Barhebraeus.  And `~š I means clothes-moth, which when it folds its wings, makes a v-shape rather like Aldebaran and the four brightest stars in the Hyades.

 

P-B      Babylonian astronomy and astrology continued to develop, spreading into the G world where the more sophisticated G geometry was applied to these studies.  An emphasis on individual astrology develops, based on the heavens at the time of one's birth, reaching its zenith in the Hellenistic city of Alexan­dria.  Numer­ous astrolog­ical papyri survive from this period in Egypt.

 

In the LXX, kk~b is rendered about equally often by astr and astron, the latter usually in the plur.  There appears to be no strong distinction between these terms.

 

The Pseudepigraphal literature shows interest in astrology and astrono­my.  1 Enoch and Jubilees indicate that astrology was taught to humans by the angels who sinned in Gen 6:1-4 (1 Enoch 8:1-4; Jub 8:3).  Serug and Nahor practiced astrology, but Abraham was turned away from it by "a word which comes to his heart" one night while watching the stars to make predictions (Jub 12:16-21).  Stars are moun­tains of fire (1 Enoch 18:13-15), driven through the heavens by winds (1 En 18:4).  A large section of 1 Enoch (chs 72-82) is devoted to a description of the detailed movements and nature of sun, moon and stars allegedly given to Enoch by the angel Uriel.

 

NT       The most famous star in the NT is the star of Bethlehem, which brought the Magi from the east to worship Jesus (Matt 2:1-12).  The star has been variously identified as a (super)nova, a comet, a conjunction of planets, an object like the pillar of fire which guided Israel, an angel, or as purely fictional.  The behavior of the star after the Magi had consulted Herod (it "went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was") best fits some localized supernatural phenomenon, though some have suggested ways of interpreting this as an object at astronomical distances.  Probably the star is to be under­stood as a fulfillment of Balaam's prophecy (Num 24:17) and as symbolic of Jesus (see below).

 

The NT follows the OT in connecting the vast number of stars with the promise to Abraham of uncountable descendants (Heb 11:12); in associating stars with angels (Rev 1:20; 9:1; 12:4?); and in seeing eschatological signs in the sun, moon and stars (e.g., Luke 21:25), though here the emphasis is on the stars falling (Matt 24:29; Mark 13:25; Rev 6:13) more than upon their being darkened (Rev 16:10).  One of the trumpet plagues of Rev (8:10-11) consists of a star falling on the rivers and poisoning their waters, an effect paralleled in the disastrous meteor fall that ended the Creta­ceous period (Cowen).

 

Symbolically, "wandering stars" are used as a vivid picture of the heretics denounced in Jude 13, probably in the sense of comets moving away from the sun into the darkness beyond, rather than as planets which C though erratic in their move­ments C always keep coming back.  The "morning star" is explicitly a symbol for Jesus in Rev 22:16 and probably also in Rev 2:28 and 2 Pet 1:19.  In the first two of these, the reference is apparently to the planet Venus as the morning star, a symbol perhaps of Jesus' first advent as the bright light shining in the darkness before the coming of day.  In 2 Pet 1:19, by contrast, the reference seems to be to the sun as "morning star," with Jesus' second advent in view, when darkness will be entirely banished.  The sun, moon and stars of Joseph's dream (Gen 37) appear again in the heavenly sign of the pregnant woman in Rev 12:1, variously identified as Mary, Israel, or the people of God.  Perhaps she and the dragon in this passage are also to be associated with the constellations Virgo and Draco.

 

Other astronomical terms: 6 š~mayim (heaven, sky, # 9028); 6 šemeš (sun, # 9087); 6 y~ra (moon, # 3734); 6 ab~' II (hosts, armies [of heaven], # 7372); 6 eder (constellations, # 2540).

 

Bibliography

KBL3 441-42; BDB 456; TWOT 425-26; IDB 4:236-44; IDBS 76-78; ISBE 1:341-48; BEB 1:223-28; ZPEB 1:393-99; EJ 3:788-807; B. L. Van der Waerden, "Babylonian Astrono­my.  II. The Thirty-Six Stars," JNES 8, 1949, 6-26; "Babylonian Astronomy. III.  The Earliest Astro­nomical Computations," JNES 10, 1951, 20-34; W. Hartner, "The Earliest History of the Constellations in the Near East and the Motif of the Lion-Bull Combat," JNES 24, 1965, 1-16; G. Schiaparelli, Astronomy in the Old Testament, 1905; E. W. Maunder, Astronomy of the Bible, 1908; F. Roch­berg-Halton, "Astrology in the ANE," ABD 1:504-07; G. R. Driver, "Two Astronomical Passages in the OT," JTS 4, 1953, 208-12; G. R. Driver, "Two Astronomi­cal Passages in the OT," JTS 7, 1956, 1-11; E. L. Martin, The Star that Astonished the World, 1991; R. Cowen, "The Day the Dinosaurs Died," Astrono­my, Apr 1996, 34-41.

 

Robert C. Newman